You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Theory of Mind’ category.
I have written a few times about the screen addiction issues that dominate a good deal of the interactions with our spectrum boys. On any given day the noise in the home is punctuated with some or all of the following:
The annoying – “Can I play?” (Put on a whinny voice, and remember, the questioner is a child with no sense of boundaries who gets right up in your face and whose breath practically shouts – “Hey! I haven’t brushed my teeth in what? A month now?”)
The banal – “Just five more minutes?”
The manipulative – “I’m almost at the end of the level (Translation – I need another 20-30 minutes)”
And the sure-fire tantrum bomb – “It’s not fair! How come he ALWAYS gets to play?”
If you seek a textbook definition of a love/hate relationship; this is the one.
It would probably make for good reading to compose a laundry list of all the pros and cons of “screen time,” and there are quite a few good points to argue in both directions. For today though, I would like to share one of the most pernicious challenges we face, and bring it to light through a conversation with my 13 year-old NLD son, which in itself tells a cool story too.
On a recent day, out of the blue, he got hung up on the disparity he has seen between himself and his older brother. As he correctly noted, the fifteen year old is pretty much given free reign on the computer. Whereas the other children rarely play during the school week and even then, no more than 45 minutes, he plays every night for an hour and a half.
As is his nature [the thirteen year old], he persisted in asking no less than fifty times, with each iteration his voice dropping more into that monotone that tells us he is slowly melting down.
Because he is hyper-sensitive to anything that smells of criticism, I knew that he would react poorly to my pointing out that his older brother is an exceptional student who has learned to strike a balance between play and getting his work done. While a more sensible child would take this as a challenge to do better so he too could earn this right, an NLD boy hears this as a put-down and that this is “all my fault!”
Here is what I told him instead:
“I am going to share with you some personal information about your brother, and you cannot repeat this to him. This is between you and me. While your brother is very smart, he possesses none of the gifts you have. He doesn’t write stories, he cannot draw, he does not play an instrument and he has a difficult time making friends.
Imagine what your life would be like without these outlets. How would you feel? How would you fill up the time without friends or hobbies?”
He sat quietly and listened as I laid this all out to him. Under normal circumstances I should have left off there and made this a pitch for compassion; but sadly, there has been so much bad blood between them, that I felt I needed to up the ante and really drive home the point. I continued:
“When your life is pretty empty, you have to find things to fill in the gaps or else you will go crazy. And what happens when people go crazy? They lash out and hurt people. The computer is your brother’s drug – its what keeps him from whupping the daylights out of you. You may not like it, and really, neither do we, but if he doesn’t have this, he will turn on you in a second and then your life will really be miserable.”
Amazingly, he got it. Since that conversation he has not shared this information with his brother (significant for someone with poor impulse control) and he bought into the concept that the computer is for his brother what Adderall is to him – a tool to assist in maintaining balance and focus.
Beyond this insightful moment is the very real challenge we face dealing with this “drug” addiction. He [the fifteen year old] has such a narrow focus of interests and no hobbies that it makes it very hard to fight giving in. On the other hand, if it is an addiction, shouldn’t we be doing more to help him overcome it and discover hidden talents (he’s got to have them)?
For another conversation.
Its Your Turn to Share: How do you deal with sibling rivalry? What works best in your home?
LJ

Adam Bomb
October 29, 2010 in Commentary, General Info, Raising Children, Social Skills, Theory of Mind | Tags: Adam film, AS, Aspergers, Claire Danes, Hugh Dancy, Lonliness, Max Mayer, Normal, Relationships, Romance | Leave a comment
“So….what did you think?”
“I’m not sure…You?”
“Well, it was well done to say the least.”
In the fifteen days since my wife and I finally found the time to watch Max Mayer’s big screen tribute to living with Aspergers, we’ve had this identical conversation at least a half-dozen times.
I want to be fair. Adam was really well done. Hugh Dancy’s portrayal of Adam was dead-on, except that he was a little farther down the spectrum than our son who does know how to make eye contact…most of the time. (For the trivia minded: Hugh is married to the actress Claire Danes, who recently portrayed Temple Grandin, one of the best known Aspergians. Is there something going on there? A hidden message maybe?)
While it became clear as the film progressed that scenes were deliberately designed to showcase as much Asperger shtick as can fit in 120 minutes, it never had that over-the-top contrived feel.
And I will grant that there are even some “funny” moments I suspect elicited a laugh or two from those in the audience who DON’T live with an Aspergian in their world. We were on the verge of tears when Beth yells at Adam to “stop thinking about himself all the time!” as he wakes her up in the middle of the night to rehearse his interview skills one more time. Ha Ha – Boo hoo. It really is like that folks.
So what then was the problem? Why are we struggling to wrap our heads around this film?
For starters, if you live with Aspergers, there isn’t much here that you don’t already know. We didnt have such high expectations, so I guess the affect just isnt there.
One point we both agree on, was disappointment with the film’s inability to answer the really big question that is polluting our minds of late: Would anyone find our son (or in this case: Adam) to be, as Beth puts it, “relationship material?”
We don’t come from the “lonely soul, might as well shack-up” world, which seems to be the best answer this film could conjure up. It would have been enlightening to say the least if Beth would have professed her love for Adam either because:
Of his incredible honesty – An Asperger man is never going to cheat on you because if he does, he couldn’t lie to save his life.
His intellect – Women love guys who can rattle off dates, facts and figures (because they know their birthday or anniversary will NEVER be forgotten!)
Or even…dare I say it? Pity. (And don’t tell me women never marry based on that.)
But the real reason I am feeling so ambivalent has to do with the film’s parting shot.
[Spoiler Alert! - Don't read this if you want to see the film. Unless of course, you have Aspergers, in which case, you might not pick up on the subtle message anyways]
As the film winds down, Adam has moved out to California…without Beth, and seems to be doing quite well. Cute girls flirt with him, he’s got a sweet job at an observatory, adoring visitors who lap up his overflowing knowledge and guy-friends who seem to get him.
What he doesnt have is “the girl” and a real relationship.
The film closes with Adam reading Beth’s new book about Racoons in Central Park. We hear her voice float in and she describes them as: “creatures from another world who have stumbled into our own.” This is Adam’s story, but unclear if he understands that.
What’s the final word? The image that haunts you after the lights come back on?
Everyone collectively heave a sigh of pity here
…That while the Adams out there will never be normal, at least they will be happily lost in their own little worlds.
I’m not sure if I am ready to accept that view, just yet.
Its Your Turn To Share: Letting go of our dreams for our children has got to be the most difficult things a parent ever does. What have you had to let go of, and how did you do it?
LJ